The biggest headline coming out of the settlement proposal for the House v. NCAA class action lawsuit over name, image, and likeness rights is the potential for a revenue-sharing agreement between schools and players.

But the 300-page proposal also includes an entire section that would hand unprecedented control over name, image, and likeness deals to the NCAA. The goal: to weed out NIL deals considered “pay-for-play,” where NIL collectives and boosters offer astronomical sums in exchange for miniscule marketing activities.