NIL: A Trend of Exploitation
For decades, a fierce debate between the NCAA and its athletes raged. While the NCAA and its member schools generated millions of dollars from the faces of their athletes, these athletes went home from every game empty-handed. Despite being recognized for their on-field accomplishments, they were never rewarded. Although collegiate athletes protested relentlessly for the right to profit from their name, image, and likeness, their requests were denied time and time again. When Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) legislation was passed in 2021, athletes were finally given the right to monetize their personal brand. However, despite the potential to generate equity and create lucrative opportunities, athletes are still vulnerable to exploitation from the NCAA, businesses, boosters, and scammers. A solution may lie within Congress’ power.
Recent Controversies & Potential Solutions
Without clear federal guidelines, the potential for exploitation remains high. After numerous instances of
athletes being failed by current NIL policy, NCAA president Charlie Baker expressed his desire for a
solution: “We’re continuing to advocate for Congress to create national NIL guidelines that will protect student
athletes from exploitation, including the use of standard contracts.”
The following examples highlight the unpredictability of current NIL policy and how it could have been
prevented with federal guidelines.
● Savannah Schoenherr - University of Florida (2023): Savannah Schoenherr is offered $1,500 to
model for a New York clothing brand. After arrangements are made, Schoenherr receives a
$3,000 check and tries to deposit it. Before she gets around to paying the $1,500 for a “facility
fee,” the check bounces and Schoenerr realizes she was almost scammed.
Exploitation often occurs without consumer protection measures. Congress could mandate that the NCAA provides resources, such as legal counsel or some form of standardized review process for athletes negotiating NIL contracts, which would ensure that athletes are signing legitimate NIL deals. While some universities have internal policies or resources that provide advisors for these deals, it varies significantly depending on the school.
● Jaden Rashada - University of Georgia Football (2024): Jaden Rashada files lawsuit against
multiple members of the Florida athletic department. During the recruitment process, a Florida
booster group offers a $13.85 million NIL package to secure Rashada. Rashada signs his letter of
intent, but shortly before payment is due, the booster group rescinds the contract.
● Matthew Sluka - University of Nevada, Las Vegas (2024): Matthew Sluka announces his decision
to sit out the remainder of the season after the team failed to fulfill NIL promises.
“I committed to UNLV based on certain representations that were made to me, which
were not upheld after I enrolled. Despite discussions, it became clear that these
commitments would not be fulfilled in the future.”
A template contract created by the NCAA includes provisions that Charlie Baker believes should be
included in a fair contract. The template contains required elements, such as a description of work or
services that the athlete should perform for compensation, the amount of compensation, and the contract
duration.
This template could be used as a basis for standardized contracts, which Congress could mandate.
Athletes are susceptible to exploitation because of the current ambiguity of NIL laws, but by requiring
contracts to clearly define the terms of the agreement, Congress would prevent unfulfilled NIL promises.
Once the athlete signs the contract and commits to a school, they should be unable to rescind it.
Overall, the implementation of federal NIL legislation is likely to prevent much of the exploitation that
still takes place in collegiate athletics.
Danica Zelvin is a high school senior interested in Name, Image, and Likeness contracts. She can be found on LinkedIn here.
Sources:
EPS Machine EPS Cutting…
EPS Machine Eps Raw…
EPS Machine EPS Recycling…
EPS Machine EPS Mould;
EPS Machine EPS Block…
EPP Machine EPP Shape…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding…
EPS Machine Aging Silo…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding…
EPS Machine EPS and…
EPS Machine EPS and…
AEON MINING AEON MINING
AEON MINING AEON MINING
KSD Miner KSD Miner
KSD Miner KSD Miner
BCH Miner BCH Miner
BCH Miner BCH Miner
EPS Machine EPS Cutting…
EPS Machine Eps Raw…
EPS Machine EPS Recycling…
EPS Machine EPS Mould;
EPS Machine EPS Block…
EPP Machine EPP Shape…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding…
EPS Machine Aging Silo…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding…
EPS Machine EPS and…
EPS Machine EPS and…
AEON MINING AEON MINING
AEON MINING AEON MINING
KSD Miner KSD Miner
KSD Miner KSD Miner
BCH Miner BCH Miner
BCH Miner BCH Miner
EPS Machine EPS Cutting…
EPS Machine Eps Raw…
EPS Machine EPS Recycling…
EPS Machine EPS Mould;
EPS Machine EPS Block…
EPP Machine EPP Shape…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding…
EPS Machine Aging Silo…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding…
EPS Machine EPS and…
EPS Machine EPS and…
AEON MINING AEON MINING
AEON MINING AEON MINING
KSD Miner KSD Miner
KSD Miner KSD Miner
BCH Miner BCH Miner
BCH Miner BCH Miner
EPS Machine EPS Cutting…
EPS Machine Eps Raw…
EPS Machine EPS Recycling…
EPS Machine EPS Mould;
EPS Machine EPS Block…
EPP Machine EPP Shape…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding…
EPS Machine Aging Silo…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding…
EPS Machine EPS and…
EPS Machine EPS and…
AEON MINING AEON MINING
AEON MINING AEON MINING
KSD Miner KSD Miner
KSD Miner KSD Miner
BCH Miner BCH Miner
BCH Miner BCH Miner
EPS Machine EPS Cutting…
EPS Machine Eps Raw…
EPS Machine EPS Recycling…
EPS Machine EPS Mould;
EPS Machine EPS Block…
EPP Machine EPP Shape…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding…
EPS Machine Aging Silo…
EPTU Machine ETPU Moulding…
EPS Machine EPS and…
EPS Machine EPS and…
AEON MINING AEON MINING
AEON MINING AEON MINING
KSD Miner KSD Miner
KSD Miner KSD Miner
BCH Miner BCH Miner
BCH Miner BCH Miner